The World's "First Anti-Chavista Writer" More Relevant Today than Ever
“No man is a prophet in his own land.”
This
Spanish aphorism is a very fitting summary of the life of the great
Venezuelan classical-liberal intellectual Carlos Rangel. A rather
obscure figure in the realm of liberalism, Rangel had very powerful
insights regarding Latin American politics and the reasons for the
region’s underdevelopment.
Carlos
Enrique Rangel Guevara was born in Caracas on September 17, 1929.
Rangel completed his entire primary and secondary education in
Venezuela, but pursued higher education abroad in the United States and
France.
He
graduated with a bachelor of arts degree at Bard College and received
the Certificat d’Etudes at the Sorbonne in Paris. He then completed a
master’s degree at New York University.
After
finishing his studies, Rangel embarked on a career as a diplomat in
Brussels and the Dominican Republic. He then pursued journalistic
endeavors as the director of Momento magazine and moderator of TV shows like Frente a la Prensa (Facing the Press).
Rangel
spent nearly 20 years on television discussing his ideas on topics
dealing with Venezuelan and international affairs with various figures,
most notably Friedrich Hayek. Unfortunately, Rangel took his own life in 1988. The circumstances behind his suicide are still shrouded in mystery.
One of the more overlooked aspects of his career was his side venture as a writer. In 1977, he published The Latin Americans: Their Love-Hate Relationship with the United States, titled originally in Spanish as Del buen Salvaje al Buen Revolucionario – Mitos y Realidades De América Latina (1976).
This book was followed by Third World Ideology and Western Reality: Manufacturing Political Myth (1986), which was first published as El tercermundismo (1982).
Rangel
was also a respected columnist at the national and international level.
A compilation of his articles was published posthumously (1988) in a
book titled Marx y los socialismos reales y otros ensayos (Marx and Real Socialism and Other Essays), which is only available in Spanish.
Without a doubt, Rangel’s magnum opus was The Latin Americans.
Arguably one of classical liberalism’s best-kept secrets, this book
gives an incisive analysis of why Latin America is underdeveloped when
compared to other regions.
Rangel
pulled no punches, effectively dispelling “the web of lies in which
Latin America has found itself,” and refuting the conventional myth that
the backwardness of Latin America is mostly due to US imperialism in
the region.
Rangel’s
greatest strength lied in his societal analysis of Latin America that
went beyond fancy economic models and political electioneering. Rangel
in The Latin Americans observed that despite throwing off
Spanish rule in the 19th century, vestiges of the colonial political
order seeped into the social fabric of Latin American society.
“The
peasant still has the attitude of a slave; he still expects others to
make his decisions for him, and prays only that these new masters will
be less demanding and better-intentioned toward him,” Rangel keenly
observed.
An otherwise prophetic analysis, given that Latin Americans still embrace collectivist authoritarians to this day.
Despite
the criticism he levied at the status quo, Rangel was no reactionary. A
critic of both the “left” and the “right,” Rangel envisioned a
Venezuela, and a Latin America as a whole, that would follow basic
principles of liberty, such as democracy, rule of law, and free trade.
Rangel’s
love for democratic principles was unmatched in Latin America. He
powerfully spells out the need for democracy as a way to peacefully
transfer political power.
“Democracy
is not so unsophisticated as to claim that there are no social
antagonisms or tensions amounting to class struggle; but it holds that a
workable compromise solution can always be found that will be
acceptable to these contending interests — or at least preferable to the
alternatives of civil war or tyranny,” he writes in The Latin Americans.
“Such
truly democratic solutions may never be perfect or fully satisfy any of
the parties, but they have the merit of reducing hatred and intolerance
as prime determinants of social actions.”
Military
coups, civil wars, and violent Marxist uprisings was the order of the
day in Latin America during Rangel’s lifetime. A peaceful transition
from one government to the next was a very rare occurrence in the region
in those days.
At
the same time, Rangel knew that the road to liberty was no easy task.
He constantly warned about the siren song of populism and other forms of
interventionist ideologies. At the time when Rangel published his
works, Venezuela had a relatively stable economy by Latin American
standards, despite the country’s shaky institutional foundations. Sadly,
many Venezuelan citizens did not heed Rangel’s warnings.
As one author so succinctly put it, Carlos Rangel was effectively “the first anti-Chavista in the world,”
given his ability to foretell the rise of a populist figure like Hugo
Chávez in Venezuela’s near future. Sadly, history has shown on numerous
occasions that many forward-looking thinkers’ warnings receive constant
ridicule from their peers. This willful ignorance came at a steep price,
as many Venezuelans have figured out since Hugo Chávez came to power in
1998.
In times where Venezuela is experiencing all sorts of economic turmoil and public-security issues
due to socialist policies pursued by Hugo Chávez and his successor
Nicolás Maduro, Rangel’s revolutionary ideas are as relevant today as
ever. Thankfully organizations such as Cato Institute’s Hispanic branch El Cato and the Venezuelan free market think tank CEDICE have made valiant efforts to preserve the Rangel’s works. Such powerful ideas just can’t wither away in obscurity.
Rangel
may have not been well known when he was alive, but his legacy still
lives on through the spontaneous order of the internet, a platform that
Rangel would be very much proud of if he were alive today. If classical
liberalism were to have its own hall of fame, Carlos Rangel definitely
deserves to be honored for his greatness.
No comments:
Post a Comment