Destroying The Traditional Family Is Leftist

By PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY

Phyllis Schlafly

Political junkies will remember how former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels was being groomed to run for president in 2012 before he made his foolish statement that the next president should "call a truce on the so-called social issues."
Americans do not want a leader who is unable or unwilling to articulate and lead on important social issues.
Four years after Daniels' misstep, many fail to learn that lesson. The New York Times has proclaimed the "libertarian moment" has arrived, by which it seems to mean libertarian ideas about marriage and the family.
We hear people say the libertarian view is to "get the government out of marriage." But where did that slogan come from? There is simply no basis for that notion in the works of classic libertarian writers.
As a Harvard graduate student, I was present for what could be considered the beginning of libertarian thought in America. It was the first American speech by Friedrich Hayek following the worldwide success of "The Road to Serfdom," which had been read by millions of Americans through its publication in the Reader's Digest.



The thesis of Hayek's great book is that government efforts to redistribute the benefits and burdens of economic activity inevitably involve a loss of individual freedoms, which could lead to a totalitarian state, as happened in Germany and Russia.
Now, 70 years later, Hayek's basic idea is part of most Republican stump speeches and forms the basis for Republicans' adamant opposition to ObamaCare.
But nothing in Hayek's works or those of his fellow Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises questioned the value or necessity of civil marriage in a free society. There is nothing to suggest that regulation of marriage was inconsistent with individual freedom.
Mises' American disciple, the radical libertarian Murray Rothbard, proposed selling off lighthouses to private owners; the structures would then be supported by voluntary contributions from passing ships. Rothbard wanted to privatize nearly everything, but he never suggested privatizing marriage.
Another influential libertarian was Russian-born Ayn Rand, whose novels depict a titanic struggle between the creative geniuses who need maximum freedom to produce vs. the "looters" and "second handers" who try to regulate them and share their wealth. Ayn Rand attacked Christianity and other conventional beliefs, but never questioned the value and necessity of civil marriage defined by law.
If nothing in Hayek, Mises, Rothbard or Rand supports the abolition, redefinition or privatization of marriage, where did those ideas come from? The answer is that they came from writers on the left — most significantly from the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx and published in 1848.