'Alex Salmond's sums are implausible': Leading U.S. economist attacks Yes campaign's promises and urges Scots to dismiss them 'out of hand'
- Ex-chairman of US Federal Reserve speaks out ahead of referendum
- Says oil forecasts are 'implausible' and a currency union is 'inconceivable'
- Other senior American figures have called on the UK to stay together
The
highly respected US economist Alan Greenspan has warned against Scottish
independence, dismissing Alex Salmond's campaign promises as
'implausible' and saying 'there's no conceivable way' Scotland could
share the pound.
The
former chairman of the US Federal Reserve accused the Yes campaign of
drastically understating the economic damage a Yes vote in Thursday's
referendum would cause.
Mr Greenspan, who is known for usually being circumspect, was scathing about Alex Salmond’s oil projections.
He said: ‘Their forecasts are so implausible they really should be dismissed out of hand.’
Scroll down for video
Intervention: Alan Greenspan, left, has spoken out against the Scottish independence campaign led by Alex Salmond, right
And he insisted there was no chance of London agreeing to a currency union.
‘There’s
no conceivable, credible way the Bank of England is going to sit there
as a lender of last resort to a new Scotland,’ Mr Greenspan added.
Washington
has become increasingly concerned that its oldest ally is about to be
weakened by a Yes vote. President Barack Obama has twice warned against a
Yes vote and the White House yesterday said it hoped the UK remained
‘strong, robust and united’.
Yet more high-profile figures made direct appeals to Scots yesterday.
Robert
Zoellick, the former deputy secretary of state and World Bank
president, said: ‘Like many Americans, and given that my name is Robert
Bruce Zoellick, I have an admiration for the Scots, their heritage, and
their role in the US and world history.
‘But
a break-up of the UK would be a diminution of Britain and a tragedy for
the West just at a moment when the US needs strong partners. I strongly
suspect it would not work out well for the Scots either.’
Warnings:
Other top US figures including Robert Zoellick, left, and John McCain,
right, have also flagged up the dangers posed by Scotland splitting from
the UK
Plea: David Cameron last night asked Scottish voters to trust in Britain and vowed radical change
Senator
John McCain, a former Republican presidential candidate who regards the
UK as Washington’s most important military and intelligence partner,
said he was reluctant to comment on an internal issue in another
country.
But
he added: ‘I don’t see how it could be helpful, not just as far as
intelligence ties are concerned but to the unique military relationship
as well.’
Another big issue for the US would be the uncertainty surrounding the future of Britain’s nuclear deterrent.
American
foreign policy experts fear that a Scottish Yes vote would embolden
Russia – especially in Ukraine – even as it weakened the UK and thus
Europe’s ability to mount a united response.
‘Russia
could argue that separatist movements are actually perfectly
legitimate, whether in Crimea or eastern Ukraine,’ said Ivo Daalder,
former US ambassador to Nato and now president of the Chicago Council on
Global Affairs.
‘Of course, a democratic process that takes two years is not the same as an annexation and a fake referendum.’
Yesterday,
President Obama’s chief spokesman, Josh Earnest, chose his words with
care when asked to comment on Scottish independence.
He
said: ‘We certainly respect the right of individual Scots to make a
decision... along these lines. But, as the President himself said, we
have an interest in seeing the United Kingdom remain strong, robust,
united and an effective partner.’
No comments:
Post a Comment