26 Republicans Vote Against Blackburn Amendment To Defund Obama’s Executive Amnesty For Illegal Aliens

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

by Matthew Boyle 

A whopping 26 Republicans joined the Democrats in Congress to vote against an amendment to the DHS funding bill sponsored by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN). That amendment aims to block funds for President Obama’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), largely believed to be the root cause of the border crisis last summer.
Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC) was the first Republican to break ranks. “Ellmers is [the] first GOP no vote,” Politico’s Seung Min Kim Tweeted as the vote began.
The other Republicans who voted against the measure, which passed, are: Reps. Mark Amodei (R-NV), Mike Coffman (R-CO), Ryan Costello (R-PA), Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), Jeff Denham (R-CA), Charlie Dent (R-PA), Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), Bob Dold (R-IL), Chris Gibson (R-NY), Richard Hanna (R-NY), Joe Heck (R-NV), Crescent Hardy (R-NV), John Katko (R-NY), Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), Peter King (R-NY), Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Martha McSally (R-AZ), Pat Meehan (R-PA), Devin Nunes (R-CA), Dave Reichert (R-WA), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Chris Smith (R-NJ), Fred Upton (R-MI), and David Valadao (R-CA).



Blackburn described her amendment as something that cuts off the magnet for future illegal immigration by Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC’s) to the United States.
“Last year, I had the opportunity to visit an unaccompanied alien children (UAC) facility at Fort Sill and also traveled to the southern border where I was briefed by U.S. Border Patrol agents,” Blackburn said. “These visits confirmed what we have known all along — DACA is the magnet drawing Central American children here. UAC’s believe they will receive amnesty, as those before them have.”
Ellmers has had a checkered past with immigration, and was nearly defeated by low-profile primary challenger Frank Roche last year. He had little money, having raised only $23,000 total through mid-April 2014 (just a few weeks before the primary). Ellmers had raised nearly a million dollars by that point. Nonetheless, Roche got 15,045 votes to Ellmers’ 21,412 votes—impressive for a massively underfunded candidate.
During that timeframe leading up that primary, Ellmers stumbled many times—including getting into a live on-air altercation with nationally syndicated radio host Laura Ingraham.
During that March 2014 interview, Ellmers melted down live on air under fire from calm but insistent questioning from Ingraham on amnesty. Ellmers called Ingraham “small minded,” “ignorant,” and at one point even adopted the third person to say “Renee Ellmers thinks for herself” when Ingraham pressed her on why she was using talking points that the National Council of La Raza first developed.
When asked on Wednesday to explain her vote against Blackburn’s amendment—she actually voted for a similar amendment from Blackburn this past summer, meaning this appears to be a change of position on that issue for her—and her vote against the amendment from Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL) that aims to block funding for Obama’s November 2014 executive amnesty, Ellmers’ spokesperson provided Breitbart News with a lengthy statement from the congresswoman.
In it, Ellmers makes the case for amnesty for illegal aliens because she claims there is a shortage of American workers who can do jobs in her district. But first she began by stating she’s opposed to the president’s action—even though she voted against fighting him.
“The vote we were forced to take today is a direct result of the President’s unilateral executive action on amnesty. His top-down approach to handling this matter is out of line, and I will fight tooth and nail to put a stop to his amnesty plan,” Ellmers said.

However I simply cannot support legislation that is overly broad in scope, as it has the potential to have a real, negative and lasting impact on jobs and families in North Carolina. There are businesses in the Second District who contract with Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and many of these jobs could be put in jeopardy with the passing of this legislation. Additionally, I have serious concerns about amendments to the appropriations act, as they may remove protections for victims of sexual assault or domestic abuse.

She also said she wasn’t included in discussions about this legislation and that her voice wasn’t heard in the process.

When discussions were had regarding this legislation, I wasn’t included and didn’t have the opportunity to voice my concerns. But in an effort to address the issues I had with this legislation, I offered two amendments but both were denied a vote on the House floor. I will continue to be a leading voice in the area of immigration reform, and I will work to find ways to reform our broken system currently in place. I will remain vigilant as we re-enter these discussions for FY 2016 to ensure that the priorities of the Second District and the concerns of this legislation are resolved, and I look forward to seeing the legislation that the Senate sends back to us.

Ingraham isn’t buying it. The radio host endorsed Ellmers’ primary opponent last year. Even though Ingraham’s candidate Roche lost, she showed her muscle in primaries later in the year by helping now Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) beat then House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.
“Sadly, Ellmers is the puppet of the Chamber of Commerce and the GOP donor class that helped rescue her reelection,” Ingraham told Breitbart News about Ellmers’ votes against the Aderholt and Blackburn amendments. “Betraying the U.S. working class to feather the nest of big business is abominable and unforgivable.”
Daniel Horowitz, the senior editor of the Conservative Review, added that Ellmers hurt her constituents with this vote.
“Today, Rep. Ellmers, who previously said she ‘thinks for herself,’ betrayed her constituents and conservatives across the nation as she rubber stamped the Left’s amnesty plan,” Horowitz said. “Not only was her vote a vote for amnesty, it was also a vote to allow Obama to misuse funds for a program that was implemented unconstitutionally.”
It’s unclear what will happen to Ellmers moving forward, but she’s all but certain to face another primary challenge—this time a more prepared one—from the right in 2016.